"STARK" LAW RAISES RED
FLAG
FOR MANY REFERRALS
By
Seth M. Wolf, Esq.
(This article originally appeared
in Crain's Cleveland Business
on 02/05/01)
The Health Care Financing Administration
recently issued the first part of its final rule on
the "Stark" law, which generally prohibits
physicians from referring patients for specific
health services to entities in which the physician
or a family member has a financial stake.
The law specifically disallows physicians from
making referrals to entities with which they or
their family members have ownership, investment or
other financial relationships.
Among the health services in question are
clinical laboratory services; physical,
occupational and speech therapy services; radiology
services; radiation therapy services and supplies;
certain types of medical equipment; prosthetics,
orthotics, and related devices and supplies; home
health services; prescription drugs furnished in
certain settings; and inpatient and outpatient
hospital services.
The relationships that might raise issues
concerning the law potentially are limitless. For
example, a physician's referral of a patient to a
hospital could be problematic if the physician is
paid by the hospital or pays the hospital for
consulting services, office space, equipment or any
other service.
A physician who has a direct or indirect
ownership interest in a health care provider such
as a physical therapy office could violate Stark by
referring patients to that provider.
Even orders a physician makes that are carried
out in his or her own office (such as an X-ray on a
patient using the office's own X-ray machine) might
violate the Stark law, depending on the
circumstances.
Violations of Stark might result in required
refunds to Medicare or Medicaid, significant
financial penalties and exclusion from
participation in certain health care programs,
including Medicare.
Because the reach of Stark is so broad, the law
itself contains specific exceptions that protect
certain arrangements, which otherwise would be
problematic. The interpretation of these
exceptions, and the creation of new exceptions, has
been delegated to the Health Care Financing
Administration.
The administration issued proposed regulations
on the Stark law during 1998. Since then, health
care providers have been waiting for final
regulations that would provide guidance on what
arrangements were acceptable under Stark. The first
part of these final regulations was published last
month. The second half is expected to be released
soon.
The final regulations make numerous changes to
the Stark law as previously understood.
For example, physicians or groups that rent
certain pieces of equipment on a daily basis might
not be able to continue doing so because the final
regulations make such arrangements difficult, if
not impossible, to maintain.
Another example involves the potential for
physicians to sell items such as crutches, canes
and manual wheelchairs directly to their patients
for a profit if specified requirements are met.
Because the changes are so significant, the
administration has delayed enforcement of the new
regulations until Jan. 4, 2002. The only exception
pertains to provisions of the rule concerning
physician relationships with home health providers,
which are effective now.
Physicians, and entities that have relationships
with physicians, therefore generally will have a
"window of opportunity," until Jan. 4, 2002 to
review their existing arrangements and to make any
changes necessary to come into compliance.
They also might wish to revisit potential
arrangements they previously avoided to see if the
Stark regulations regarding them have been relaxed.
Health care providers must recognize that any
previous analysis of Stark compliance should be
revisited.
| Practice Areas
| Attorney
Profiles | Publications
|
| Seminars | Screen
for Exclusion | Contact
Info |
| Directions |
Home |
Rolf & Goffman Co., L.P.A.
Phone 216-514-1100
E-mail info@rolfgoffman.com
|