|
|
LONG-TERM CARE MANAGED
CARE CONTRACTING SKILLS
By
Aric D. Martin, Esq.
I. Getting Ready for
Managed Care
II. Choosing the
Right Managed Care Organization
III. Negotiating
the Contract
A.
Important Provisions - General
 1.
Coverage issues
 2.
Utilization review
 3.
Payment
 4.
Termination
B.
Important Provisions for Nursing Facilities
 1.
Admission, transfer & discharge
 2.
Notifications
 3.
Requirements for participation
C.
Important "Miscellaneous" Provisions
IV. Conclusion
There is a drive in the long-term care industry
for facilities to execute managed care contracts,
and a feeling by many facilities that they are
"behind the times" in entering into such
agreements. Often those sentiments lead facilities
to feel rushed to enter into agreements, and to
perhaps take the leap before they are ready. A
basic managed care contracting skill that all
nursing facilities should develop is to know when
to contract in the first place. Other parts of this
Manual have discussed preparing your facility for
managed care, and how to choose a managed care
provider. Because of the importance those two
concepts have in relation to managed care
contracting, we will briefly discuss them here as
well. We will then discuss specific provisions in
managed care contracts that have caused problems
for long-term care providers.
This section of the Manual seeks to accomplish
three things: (1) to provide you with a framework
through which to approach managed care contracting;
(2) to provide you with a basic understanding of
some basic negotiating and managed care principles;
and (3) to review some key provisions which
generally appear in managed care contracts with
nursing facilities.
I.
Getting Ready for Managed Care
The first step in managed care contracting is to
determine whether your organization really wishes
to enter into managed care contracts, and if so,
whether it is ready to do so. In order to enter
into managed care contracts that will benefit your
organization, you should first know what sort of
services it is equipped to provide, how quickly it
can provide those services, and how much it costs
to provide those services.
Facilities should conduct an inventory and
self-audit in which you examine your direct care
staff and personnel, your physical facilities and
structure, and your indirect and overhead staff and
ask the following questions:
- Do you have sufficient resources to handle
admission determinations and documentation,
e.g., verification of eligibility, and an
evaluation of whether your facility can provide
the level of care needed?
- Can your facility provide the services
requested at the time that such services are
requested, i.e., are you equipped to
admit patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, or
is your staffing such that nighttime and weekend
admits are not possible?
- Do you have sufficient resources to maintain
the necessary records during the managed care
patients stay, and to bill for those
services? Remember that each contract you enter
into may have completely different billing and
record-keeping requirements that your staff will
need to understand and implement correctly in
order to be paid for services rendered.
- Do you have sufficient resources to ensure
that the bill which your facility submits for
services rendered will be able to withstand the
scrutiny of the managed care organizations
utilization review process both at the
time of submission and during any retrospective
review periods.
- What services are you equipped to provide
both from a structural and staffing
standpoint, e.g., do you have the
capability to provide vents and respiratory
therapy, dialysis, care for persons with HIV,
care for persons with diabetes, cardiac
rehabilitation, etc.?
- What population are you equipped to serve,
and what population will you be asked to serve?
For example, is your facility equipped to care
not only for an elderly population, but also for
a younger population that may need short-term
rehabilitative care, i.e., not just in
terms of traditional medical care, but also from
a psychological and activities standpoint?
- Does your facility have any particular
expertise in treating a particular
diagnosis?
- What are the diagnoses of the discharges
that you will be admitting?
After conducting an inventory of your current
capabilities, and the needs of the potential
managed care population, you will need to determine
whether your facility is in a position to
effectively care for that population. If it is not,
then you will need to find out how much it will
cost you in order to get into such a position.
II.
Choosing the Right Managed Care
Organization
After you have conducted an inquiry into your
organizations readiness to provide care to
managed care patients, and you have decided to
enter into such agreements, you will need to decide
which managed care organizations ("MCOs") would be
a good match for your facility. As you are aware,
there are a proliferation of managed care products
being developed in the market today. It is thus
important that your facility is diligent in
determining which of the products offered will best
serve its needs and unique structure.
The primary reason for entering into a managed
care contract is (1) to obtain access to previously
untapped patient streams, and (2) to ensure
predictability of patients and revenue. Thus, some
analysis of the proposed managed care product may
be appropriate prior to entering into active
negotiation. Consider the following:
- Evaluate the proposed arrangement in light
of the long-term goals and strategic plans of
your organization.
- What is the managed care products
volume of enrollees?
- What other providers are under contract with
the network or plan?
- Will your facility be the exclusive provider
of services in the area?
- Who owns the plan or network, and what kind
of management/administration does it have?
- Determine the actual cost of providing the
care required by the proposed arrangement.
- In making this determination, you will
need to define the covered services.
- You will also need to predict the
expected utilization of each of the covered
services, e.g., the number of visits,
patient days, or prescriptions during one
year per a certain number of people.
- You then must determine what the desired
reimbursement rate should be for each of the
covered services (per day, per procedure, per
month, per visit).
- Take into consideration the effect of
copayments on the expected cost of health
care services.
- Predict the effect of age and sex on
expected utilization.
- Conduct a due diligence investigation and
review the following:
- Copies of any rules or regulations and
utilization review procedures that your
facility will be required to abide by.
- Financial statements or audits of the
plan or network.
- State and federal filings with applicable
agencies.
- Newspaper and other media
sources.
The purpose of the above steps is for your
organization to have a clear picture of what
services it can offer, and what reimbursement it
must receive for those services in order to make an
acceptable profit. It is also to discover whether
the managed care provider or network has a
sufficient number of enrollees to give your
facility a predictable patient flow, and also
whether the product has adequate capitalization to
protect against insolvency. If, after this
background analysis of both your organization and
the managed care product, you decide to move
forward in the negotiation of a contract with the
plan or network, then it is important that you
understand some basic principles of managed care
contracting.
III.
Negotiating the Contract
In the negotiation of any contract it is crucial
that before you actively begin negotiations that
you fully understand what you want to achieve at
the end of the negotiation. That is, you must
establish in advance a hierarchy of your goals, and
to know what you are willing to give up. In order
to accomplish this feat in the managed care
context, armed with the knowledge you gained
through your self-audits, you will need to be
familiar with the following concepts.
- The contract drives the relationship.
The contract that you execute with a managed
care organization will define your business
relationship. Unlike with traditional
governmental reimbursement systems, such as
Medicare, external rules and regulations which
define elements of the relationship between the
provider and payor are scarce. There are laws in
place to protect the beneficiary of managed care
services, but not many laws to protect the
provider of services.
As in all business contracts, you are assumed
to have a level of sophistication sufficient to
protect your interests in a contract
negotiation. If you negotiate a bad deal, then
you have only yourself to blame. Thus, it is
vital for nursing facility operators to
understand that their future relationship with
the managed care organization will be driven by
the contract, and that they cannot rely on
outside rules to protect them.
- You do not have to accept the form contract.
Given the fact that the managed care contract
will define almost all of your rights and
responsibilities in your relationship with the
managed care organization, the dangers of
signing an MCOs "form contract" should be
apparent.
Understandably, a managed care organization
will draft its form contract in a very one-sided
manner with some terms that may be very
unreasonable from the nursing facility
providers standpoint. Such an approach
makes sense in light of the fact that often -
too often - nursing facilities, in a rush to
"get into managed care", simply sign the
agreement they are given. Long-term care
providers, however, should view the MCOs
form contract as its first proposal - a starting
point to begin negotiations. Managed care
organizations expect providers to object to
certain terms, and to attempt to negotiate a
better agreement.
- Bargaining power.
How successful you will be in changing the
MCOs form contract will be dependent in
large measure on the importance that you each
place on the others business. If a managed
care organization does not have a presence in
your county, if your facility provides a
specialized service that most facilities do not
provide or provide as efficiently as you do, if
you are part of a chain or an alliance of
facilities that can provide numerous sites of
service for the MCO, then your chances of
negotiating changes to the form contract are
greatly increased. If, however, your nursing
facility is a single facility that is not
aligned with any other area facilities, or if
the MCO can easily turn to another similarly
situated facility to provide services to its
members, then your odds of negotiating favorable
terms in your agreements will be significantly
reduced.
Before beginning negotiations, long-term
care facilities should use the self-audit
mechanism discussed above to think about how to
market themselves to managed care organizations.
That is, how to differentiate their services
from the other nursing facilities in the
area.
- Know your costs.
One element that will differentiate your
facility from others will be how efficiently you
can provide the services needed by the managed
care organizations members. If you have
the ability to market that you can provide
quality care at a cheaper price than your
competitor, then obviously the incentive to
contract with you increases.
An understanding of what it costs for you to
provide care to your patients is essential to
providing care to managed care patients. You
should know how much it costs you to provide
care to the different diagnoses that the MCO
will be referring to you. For example, what is
the cost and turn around time from admission to
discharge for an elderly woman with a hip
fracture? Your facility may wish to implement
"care pathways" to assist you in the efficient
care of patients with the diagnoses that you
will be receiving from the MCO.
- Terms are as important as price.
Many providers believe that they do not need
to have a tight handle on their costs because
they examine the price term in the proposed
managed care contract and determine that at that
price they will make a profit, based on a
comparison to past price terms with the
government for the same care. Such an attitude,
however, is misplaced in the managed care
context. As we stated above, the contract drives
the relationship. Providers need to be keenly
aware of the fact that simply because they
provided services to a managed care patient does
not mean that they will be paid for those
services.
A hard lesson for people who are not familiar
with negotiating contracts is the fact that the
terms of a contract are just as important, if
not more important, than the price being
offered. This fact is highlighted in the managed
care context. For example, a nursing facility
may willingly sign a contract whereby it will
receive $350 per patient per day for providing
skilled care services to managed care
beneficiaries because it feels confident that it
can make an acceptable profit at that rate.
However, if the contract has rigid terms, then
it may not be a beneficial contract for the
provider. For example, if the contract has such
terms as (i) an aggressive retrospective review
program, (ii) no provision to pay your facility
in a set period of time, (iii) the ability to
deny claims based on simple technical billing
errors, (iv) a provision that the rate includes
many services that the facility does not
normally provide and for which it must
subcontract, etc., then the nursing facility (i)
may not receive payment for all of the services
that it provides, (ii) have that payment taken
away at a later date, or (iii) the rate may
prove insufficient to cover the level and nature
of services that it is expected to
provide.
Managed care contracts are notorious for
having "hidden terms" which have the potential
to nullify apparently favorable conditions for
the provider of services. It is essential that
nursing facilities not simply rely on the price
that they have been quoted in determining
whether to enter into a managed care
agreement.
- Risk.
When your organization does look at the
prices proposed to you, keep in mind that you
will be expected to assume some risk in the
relationship. Many nursing facilities become
very anxious about the concept of "taking on
risk", and that anxiety effects the manner in
which they negotiate their managed care
agreements. Remember that the reason to enter
into managed care relationships is to obtain a
stream of patients and to achieve some
predictability in patient referrals. Understand
that you will not make a profit on every patient
that is referred to you, but that is not
necessarily a negative. Your facility will lose
money on many patients, but it will also make
money on many patients. The fact that it is
costing you more to provide for a particular
patient does not mean that you are losing money,
or that you have entered into an unfavorable
managed care contract. The hope is that overall
you make a profit.
Thus, the fact that you may not be able to
provide a certain service, e.g.,
respiratory therapy, to a patient for the price
quoted to you is not necessarily a deal breaker.
If you will receive only a minimal amount of
vent patient referrals (and you have provisions
in your agreement to protect against having to
accept all referrals made), then it may make
sound business sense to accept a rate with the
knowledge that you will "lose money" on each
vent patient.
- Address "deal breakers" first.
As we stated above, it is necessary that you
begin your managed care contract negotiations
with the knowledge of what you wish to achieve,
and with what end result you can live. Thus, it
is important to identify those terms that are
"deal breakers", that is, terms that you must
receive in order to execute the contract, and
address those terms first. If you can not reach
agreement with the MCO with regard to those
terms, then there is no need to review a
proposed contract. We suggest that nursing
facilities address these deal breakers with the
managed care organization prior to reviewing any
actual proposed contract language. Reaching
agreement on these terms before contract review
not only saves your organization time and money,
but also will make it easy to revise the form
contract when you receive it later if it is not
in accordance with your prior agreement.
What terms are deal breakers will vary
according to the unique structure and goals of
each organization. Generally, however, there are
certain terms that are of vital importance to
all nursing facilities, and we discuss those
first below, i.e., coverage issues,
utilization review, payment and
termination.
- Time allocation.
Finally, when entering into managed care
contract negotiations, keep in mind that this
process can often times be very lengthy. For
various reasons, these negotiations can stretch
out for months. Thus, it would be prudent for
nursing facilities to establish with the MCO
certain time frames for the review and
negotiation of the contract at the start of the
negotiations. Such an agreement is not a
guarantee that the negotiation process will
necessarily move along quickly, but hopefully it
will provide extra incentive to keep the process
moving. Also, keep in mind that the manner in
which the MCO handles the negotiation process
may be an insight into how it generally runs its
business operations
A.
Important Provisions - General
As noted above, there are certain provisions in
a managed care contract which may contain "hidden"
pitfalls for long-term care providers. These
provisions have the potential to cost a nursing
facility much in terms of money and time, and
should always be examined very closely.
1.
Coverage issues
It is very important that your managed care
contract explicitly states what services you must
provide under the payment rate, and to whom you
must provide those services. As we discussed above,
you should know the member population that the MCO
services, how many covered lives are in that
population, and the types of plans covering those
members. If you are incapable of providing care to
any of the member categories under the plan, then
you should make sure that your contract states that
fact explicitly.
Generally, a managed care contract will state
that a provider will provide "Covered Services" to
members of the MCOs plan in exchange for a
set payment rate. In order to protect your
facility, review the definition section of the
managed care agreement closely. Often times the
definition of "Covered Services" will state
something similar to the following: "Covered
Services shall mean all services and supplies
which are necessary to treat a Members
medical condition." This vague definition is
terrible for long-term care providers. This
provision allows the MCO to refer any type of
patient needing any type of care to your facility
for treatment regardless of whether your facility
even offers that service.
Another common provision of which facilities
should beware is one which states that
"Covered Services shall mean all
services and supplies to which the Member is
entitled to under his or her Members benefit
plan." This provision defines the services that you
must provide by reference to a document that you
have never seen.
In both of the definitions above, your facility
is being asked to sign an agreement which gives the
MCO carte blanche to refer any type of patient to
you for any type of service. In order to protect
your facility, you should make sure that there is a
definition of "Covered Services" in your contract,
and that that definition states explicitly which
services you will provide in return for the quoted
rate, and which services are not included in the
rate. The provision should make it clear that you
will only accept patients for whom you are
licensed, certified, equipped and/or staffed to
provide care for. The definition should also make
it clear that "Covered Services" include only those
services which are part of the members
benefits plan.
When thinking about coverage issues, also
determine whether the rate quoted is an "all
inclusive" rate. That is, will your facility
receive the same level of reimbursement regardless
of the service provided? If so, consider "carving
out" certain high cost services, e.g.,
obtaining a different payment rate for the
provision of those high cost services. A popular
option with nursing facilities is to design a
graduated rate structure whereby as the acuity
level of the referred member increases, the rate
paid by the MCO increases as well.
2.
Utilization review
The managed care organization will have a
utilization review protocol established in order to
ensure that its rules are being followed. For
example, many MCOs will have member verification
procedures that nursing facilities will be required
to follow to ensure that a patient is currently
enrolled as a member with the MCO. However,
generally this procedure will only verify that the
person is indeed a member of the plan, and that the
proposed service is covered by the plan. It will
not determine whether the proposed service is
"medically necessary." MCOs only pay for medically
necessary health care services, and thus in order
to determine whether the service that it is being
asked to pay for was medically necessary, it will
establish a utilization review ("UR") mechanism.
The nature and extent of this UR protocol and
system is different for each managed care
organization. Utilization review, however, can be
very extensive. Nursing facilities need to make
sure that this system is well-defined in their
managed care contracts, and to obtain a copy of
this mechanism as soon as possible in writing.
Generally, managed care agreements do not
address their UR mechanisms fully. It is not
uncommon for an agreement to simply state that the
long-term care provider agrees to abide by all
policies and procedures in the MCOs UR
program, which is thereby incorporated into the
agreement by reference (meaning that the program is
not attached to the agreement, but that you are
subject to its terms). It is also not uncommon for
nursing facilities to sign such a provision without
a thought. However, a broad provision like that may
nullify every term in the agreement without your
facility even being aware of that fact.
Without exception all long-term care providers
when asked if they would sign a contract under the
following conditions: (1) the contract only
contained a fraction of the terms to which they
would be legally bound; (2) they would not be made
aware of the "other" terms of the agreement before
signing the agreement; and (3) all terms of the
agreement may be changed at the sole discretion of
the other party, would emphatically state, "NO!".
However, many of those same nursing facilities sign
managed care agreements that incorporate entire
policies by reference, thereby making them part of
the agreement - policies that the providers have
never seen, and that may be changed without their
consent. Facilities should never sign a contract
that incorporates documents that it has never
seen.
It is important that UR provisions in your
managed care contracts are not open ended. Always
request to review the UR policies and procedures
prior to executing the managed care contract. If
the UR program is not established in writing at the
time of the contract negotiations and can be
amended unilaterally, then attempt to negotiate one
of the following: (a) require your facilitys
consent prior to any material changes; (b) require
the MCO to give your facility adequate written
notice of any change, and the opportunity to
comment; or (c) at a minimum, your facility must be
able to terminate the agreement without cause
immediately if it does not accept provisions of the
UR program.
As you review the MCOs UR program, you
should make sure that it adheres to certain
specifications.
- Review the qualifications for the UR
personnel, e.g., nurse reviewers should
be licensed and trained with minimum experience
requirements.
- Physician reviewers should practice in the
area that they review, e.g., you should
not have an obstetrician reviewing the medical
necessity of a geriatric procedure for which you
are requesting reimbursement.
- Do the UR personnel, or does the UR
management entity, comply with the American
Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization
Review requirements, or with the requirements of
some other certifying group?
- The procedures should include a discussion
with the attending health professional prior to
rendering a payment denial.
- Emergency admissions and procedures should
be exempt from traditional review.
- The basis for denials should be consistently
documented.
- Denials of payment should be consistently
appealable by the patient and by the
provider.
- Medical criteria should be based on local
practice standards.
In addition to negotiating the protections noted
above, i.e., seeking language which provides
that no policies are applicable to your facility
without your prior approval, asking for advance
notice of any changes to the UR program, etc., your
managed care contract should spell out certain
standards with regard to the UR program. You should
then negotiate a provision which provides that if
there is ever any conflict between the terms of the
executed contract and the policies and procedures
of the MCO, then it is the intent of the parties
that the terms in the agreement shall control. Some
standards that you may wish to consider negotiating
into your agreements are as follows:
- No retrospective
review. There should no be retrospective
review of preauthorized services. To the
extent that care is ordered by the
patients participating physician, such
care, when rendered by the provider should not
be subject to further determinations of medical
necessity. It is important that this provision
is stated explicitly in writing.
- Administrative
errors. There should not be forfeitures
for administrative errors, i.e., payment
should not be able to be denied if the services
would have been approved prospectively on the
basis of medical necessity. This applies to
situations where a nursing facility failed to
fill in a certain section of a billing form when
it submitted its claim to the MCO, or some other
minor error. An MCOs UR protocols may
state that such an error is a basis for a denial
of the entire claim.
- MCO responsibility for
design and implementation of UR program.
Language should be in the agreement which
specifically states that the MCO is responsible
for the design and implementation of the UR
program, and that the MCO should indemnify the
provider for any loss incurred as a result of
such program. MCOs should not be allowed to
shift to your facility all responsibility for
medical decisions relating to termination of
treatment resulting from the UR program, such as
clauses which state that the provider is
"solely" responsible for health care provided.
For example, if an MCO determines that a certain
service is not medically necessary and thus your
facility does not provide that service, then the
MCO should bear, or share some of, the
responsibility if you are held accountable for
that decision, e.g., in a lawsuit or a
certification citation.
- Appeal
procedures. There must be a meaningful
mechanism for your facility to appeal UR
decisions, and this mechanism must include the
ability to appeal to an independent third party.
For example, many MCOs have appeal mechanisms
whereby the "final determination" is made by the
medical director of the MCO.
- Medical
necessity. Because only medically
necessary services are covered services, then
the term should be clearly defined.
- Denials. The
agreement must specify who is responsible for
notifying patients of denials under the UR
program. Also, it should address who pays if the
patient elects to appeal, and at what rate. That
is, who keeps the money pending an appeal of a
UR decision, and is that money paid in cash or
deducted from an amount otherwise owed?
- Concurrent
review. Your agreement should require the
MCO to continue payment during a period in which
state and federal laws prohibit transfer or
discharge of a patient - even though the
MCOs concurrent review concludes that
transfer or discharge is appropriate. This
situation is one of unique vulnerability for
long-term care providers, and is discussed more
fully below.
3.
Payment
As alluded to above, an MCOs UR procedures
may require your organization to follow detailed
steps in the submission of a claim for payment in
order to be reimbursed for the services that you
provided. Often times, however, these steps are
absent from the agreement, and may be made part of
the agreement only by incorporating the UR policies
by reference. Your organization must remember that
every delay in or denial of payment to your
facility is a reduction in your profit. A late
payment to your facility is the equivalent of an
interest free loan to the MCO. Thus, it is very
important that your agreement contains specific
language which spells out to whom, when, where, at
what time, and in what manner claims are to be
submitted.
We have listed below numerous elements that you
should consider making a part of the payment
section of any managed care contracts which you
execute.
- Specify the billing form that your
organization is to use to submit its claims,
e.g., a UB-92 form. If the form that the
MCO wishes you to use is not a standard form in
the industry, but rather an internally generated
one, then attach a sample form to the agreement
as an exhibit.
- Designate the address to which claims should
be sent. Note that the MCO may allow or require
electronic submission.
- Define the receipt of a claim. For example,
if claims are submitted via regular U.S. mail,
then specify that claims are deemed received
within five days of mailing, or if via facsimile
upon receipt of a confirmation.
- Define a "clean claim." A clean claim is a
term of art in the managed care industry that
refers to a claim which will be accepted by a
payor as valid, and upon which the payor will
make payment. In essence, you want to ask the
MCO what information is absolutely necessary in
order for it to make payment on a claim, and
then to agree that if you supply that
information it will pay the claim - regardless
of any other technical defects in your claim
submission.
- Define the time frame in which the MCO must
respond to your submitted claim, e.g.,
that the MCO will within thirty days of receipt
of a claim issue payment, a denial with
explanation, or a request for more
information.
- Specify that the MCO must pay interest for
any late payments that it sends to your
facility.
- If your agreement states that our facility
is not to bill the MCO until the end of a
length-of-stay, then add language which would
allow for interim billing when the
length-of-stay is longer than expected.
- Make sure that the protections which you
have negotiated into the agreement apply to any
third-party administrators to whom the MCO has
subcontracted the claims-paying function.
- Do not allow any billing amendments without
the express written consent of a specified
person in your organization.
- Do not allow the MCO to withhold payments to
you for current services rendered based upon its
unilateral determination that prior submissions
were incorrectly paid.
4.
Termination
Although it is a standard provision, and one
that is generally not given much thought, the
termination clause in your managed care agreement
may be your ultimate protection. Being able to
terminate the contract without cause may be your
only real remedy if you are unable to negotiate out
onerous provisions from the MCOs form
contract, such as the right to amend the contract
unilaterally, and the right to change UR plans from
time to time. Thus, your facility should make sure
to avoid provisions which only allow termination
for cause, or within a certain time frame.
Do not be fooled by what appears to be a clause
which allows you to terminate for cause, but in
reality locks your facility into the agreement for
a set period of time. For example, an agreement may
specify that either party may terminate the
agreement with or without cause by providing
written notice to the other party within ninety
days prior to the end of the existing term, and
that if such notice is not given then the contract
will renew for another year period. In this
scenario, if your organization executed a one year
agreement, and then realized after the third month
that it was losing its shirt under the arrangement,
you would have to provide services under the
agreement for another nine months. Also, if you
provided any amount of notice less than ninety
days, then you would be obligated to provide
services for another whole year. This sort of
provision is fairly common, and commonly overlooked
by providers who focus on the words "terminated
with or without cause," and believe that because
they can terminate without cause they are
protected.
When reviewing the termination clause of a
proposed agreement, your facility should make sure
that the effective date and the initial term and
renewal terms are addressed. The terms should not
be greater than one year, unless exceptional
incentives are offered to your organization. You
should also retain the right to terminate the
agreement immediately, or on an expedited basis, if
the MCO materially breaches the agreement or it
makes unilateral changes to its policies and
procedures that your facility finds unacceptable.
Be prepared for the MCO to resist allowing
termination prior to the end of the term because it
may have marketed its plan to members, and
qualified it for regulatory purposes based in part
on your participation. Also, keep in mind that your
facility may not want the MCO to be able to
terminate early if it has many members that it will
be able to refer to you.
Many termination clauses in managed care
agreements provide that the nursing facility must
continue to provide care to patients who are
receiving services as of the date of the
termination until such patients are transferred or
discharged. You should make sure that your
agreement specifies that the MCO will remain liable
for payment in such a situation. This concept is
discussed more fully below.
B.
Important Provisions for Nursing
Facilities
It is important for nursing facilities to
remember that signing an agreement with a managed
care organization does not exempt them from the
myriad laws and regulations to which they are
subject under the Nursing Home Reform Act ("OBRA").
Although some managed care organizations are
improving, many do not have familiarity with
nursing facilities. It is common for a nursing
facility to receive a standard contract which was
designed for a hospital or a physician group
practice. Thus, a significant part of your managed
care contract negotiations may consist of educating
the MCO with regard to the laws and regulations to
which your organization is subject. Often times,
the MCO is not aware of the extent to which nursing
facilities are regulated. However, if you present
the MCO with evidence, i.e., a copy of the
relevant law, then you should be successful in
having the MCO revise the proposed agreement to
comport with that law.
We have provided below a sample of some of the
provisions that a nursing facility should pay close
attention to when negotiating managed care
contracts.
1.
Admission, transfer & discharge
Nursing facilities have specific laws governing
the admission, transfer and discharge of a
resident, which your managed care agreements will
need to respect. Federal law states that a nursing
facility is required to give notice to a resident
and a family member or legal representative thirty
days prior to a transfer or discharge. Managed care
contracts, however, generally provide that the MCO
will continue to pay for the care of its members
until the agreement with your facility is
terminated, or perhaps until the end of a specified
period. This situation can cause significant
financial problems for a nursing facility if it
does not reconcile the two differing
constructions.
If your facility has such a contract, and your
managed care contract is terminated while the MCO
still has several residents in your facility, then
how will you be paid for the care that you provide
to those residents post-termination? You have
signed an agreement whereby you have agreed that
the MCO will not pay you after termination of the
agreement, and you must give the residents at least
thirty days notice before you can discharge
them. Remember also that in order to discharge for
nonpayment, your facility must have given the
resident "reasonable and appropriate notice" of
their obligation to pay, so even in the absence of
state laws that protect residents in such a
situation, you will be potentially liable for over
thirty days of nonpayment.
In order to avoid such a situation, negotiate
into your agreements a provision which states that
the MCO will continue to provide payment for any
residents in your facility at the time of
termination until the MCO finds alternative
placement or the person is discharged from the
facility. This will obligate the MCO to make
payment during any notice periods that are required
by law. The rates that the MCO should pay during
this post-termination period will depend upon your
bargaining power. Generally, it will be a victory
if you establish that the MCO will pay you at the
rates in, and according to the terms and conditions
of, the contract. However, because there is no
longer a contract between your organization and the
MCO, you may attempt to establish that payment will
be made at your usual and customary private pay
rate. If you are successful in establishing such a
rate, then this will give the MCO incentive to find
alternative placement for its member after
termination.
Some other considerations that your organization
should keep in mind while it is negotiating managed
care agreements are as follows:
- Address issues of eligibility verification,
and how your facility will be able to
conclusively rely on the verification of
eligibility and coverage. For example, if you
are given a valid member identification card,
and call the MCO to verify that the person is
still a member and entitled to nursing facility
coverage, then you should be paid for the
provision of care to that person (assuming the
services were medically necessary). Some MCOs,
however, will retroactively deny reimbursement
based on the fact that the person was
subsequently discovered to have exhausted his or
her benefits; or his or her plan was
retroactively discontinued due to nonpayment by
the sponsor (employer). You should not bear the
risk of the MCOs records not being
updated.
- Often times, a managed care agreement will
simply state that a facility will provide
covered services to members of the MCO, and does
not address the admission of these members.
Under such a provision, a nursing facility has
obligated itself to accept all members
regardless of diagnosis. Your agreement should
specify what types of patients you are not
required to accept, and who makes the
determination regarding acceptance of a patient,
e.g., is the final determination made by
the facilitys medical director or the
MCO?
- An efficient way to handle the admissions
process in your managed care agreement is to
simply state that your facility will admit
patients in accordance with its normal and
customary admissions policy. You may tell the
MCO that this is necessary because your
admissions policy has been designed to comply
with specific requirements of state and federal
law. Such a provision will allow you to continue
to satisfy any waiting list laws to which you
are subject, and give you the ability to deny
admissions to patients for whom you are not
equipped to provide appropriate care.
- Remember that although you have a contract
with the MCO, federal and state law will require
that your facility have a separate admission
agreement with the resident. Some modification
of your standard admission agreement will most
likely be needed.
- Make sure to delineate the bed hold policy
of your facility, and to specify the payment
structure during any such bed holds. If you are
required to hold a bed for a resident while he
or she is at the hospital, then you should be
paid during that time.
- Your facility may wish to add a provision to
its managed care agreements which makes it clear
that it may move a resident within the various
units of the facility as needed without prior
approval from the MCO.
- Generally, a managed care contract will
state that it will have the final word with
regard to any decision to discharge the resident
from the facility. You should consider having
your agreements qualify such a provision with
language that allows your facility to discharge
a resident to the extent that it may in
accordance with state and federal law. For
example, to protect the health and safety of
other residents in the facility.
2.
Notifications
Some plans require facilities to notify them of
any adverse action that is alleged or taken by any
entity charged with regulating the facility, and of
any lawsuits. Such language is too broad in light
of the federal regulatory enforcement system. This
language would require a nursing facility to
formally notify the MCO after every survey in which
it received a citation, regardless of the fact that
the facility corrected the deficiency and no
penalty was every imposed. Such a requirement is
burdensome both for the nursing facility and for
the MCO. Rather, your agreement should specify that
your facility will notify the MCO of any
final adverse actions taken. This will
absolve your facility from reporting until it has
exhausted all of its appeal rights, and a
determination has been made to impose a
penalty.
3.
Requirements for participation
In general, the principles behind managed care
and the certification and enforcement process for
nursing facilities under OBRA are in conflict.
Managed care is based on the concept of reducing
costs and providing adequate, but cost-effective
care. OBRA, however, is not concerned with costs,
it mandates that nursing facilities must provide
care which results in the highest practicable
mental, physical and psychosocial well-being for
all of their residents. Such a standard has been
interpreted by many enforcement agencies to mean
that a facility must provide extraordinary
measures, and to exhaust all alternatives
even when professional medical opinion believes
that an alternative is not viable.
In light of these conflicting motivations, there
is the potential for nursing facilities to receive
certification deficiencies based upon the care that
they provide to their managed care patients.
Broadly, this means that a surveyor may determine
that a facility that provided cost-efficient care
to a resident based upon determinations about the
medical necessity of certain interventions by the
MCO was not sufficient to help the resident reach
his or her highest practicable state of well-being.
For example, an MCO may only authorize fifteen
units of physical therapy, but the resident is not
yet at his or her highest level of functioning. If
the nursing facility only provides fifteen minutes
of therapy, then it risks a Quality of Care
citation.
Recognizing the fact that your organization is
subject to the aforementioned standard of review,
you may wish to have that fact specifically
recognized in your agreements. That is, have the
MCO certify that it will authorize all covered
services with the intent of helping the member to
attain or maintain his or her highest practicable
state of well-being. You may then file a grievance
with the plan or appeal if it is determined that
the level authorized is not appropriate. You may
also wish to establish that residents will pay for
any care that is not authorized, but you will need
to be wary of state and federal laws protecting
managed care patients and specific provisions of
the agreement which state that you will accept the
rate as payment in full.
C.
Important "Miscellaneous" Provisions
We have included below some provisions that are
generally located under the "Miscellaneous" section
of a managed care agreement, and are assumed by
many facilities to simply be "boilerplate" language
to which they do not need to pay close attention.
These seemingly simple and "standard" provisions,
though, can create a large amount of liability on
the part of your facility if you are not
careful.
- Amendments
A managed care organization will often have
language which states that it may modify the
agreement at some future time. The provision may
simply allow for unilateral amendments, or it
may be a "negative acceptance" clause,
e.g., "MCO may amend any provision of
this Agreement upon written notice to Facility.
Facility shall be deemed to have accepted
MCOs amendment, if Facility fails to
object to such amendment in writing and submit
it to the MCO within ten days." Such a provision
allows an MCO to potentially change key terms of
the agreement either without your
facilitys approval, or with your
facilitys tacit approval if the person who
receives the notice is not quick on his or her
feet.
You should negotiate this provision as we
suggested above for the utilization review
provisions. That is, either (a) require your
facilitys consent prior to any material
changes; (b) require the MCO to give your
facility adequate written notice of any change,
and the opportunity to comment; or (c) at a
minimum, your facility must be able to terminate
the agreement without cause immediately if it
does not accept the amendment.
- Appeal rights
Your facility should be able to realistically
appeal denials of payment and coverage
immediately, and any reconsideration should be
handled by a qualified physician and not a UR
nurse. The appeals procedures for MCOs are often
buried in the utilization review procedures, and
thus may usually be modified at any time at the
discretion of the MCO. You should make sure that
the basic procedure for all appeals is spelled
out specifically in the contract
itself.
Insurance and indemnification
Make sure that both parties are required to
carry general and professional liability
insurance, and not just your facility. This is
important especially in light of emerging
theories of liability that make MCOs liable in
some cases for UR decisions and other actions
that lead to malpractice liability. Your
organization should be wary of attempts by the
MCO to shift liability for its decisions to your
facility.
Also, it is a good idea to specify the amount
and types of insurance in the agreement, rather
than relying on general language which requires
the MCO to have "adequate" insurance. The MCO
should be required to provide you with evidence
of coverage when requested, and to provide you
with notice in the event of a material change in
its coverage.
Indemnification, like insurance, should be
reciprocal if you decide to use such a clause.
Review carefully the wording of such clauses.
Many insurance policies do not cover
contractually assumed obligations. Thus, when
you sign the "boilerplate" provision which
states that your facility "agrees to indemnify
the MCO for all fines, claims, demand, suits or
actions of any kind or nature arising by nature
of your acts or omissions," you may be agreeing
to have the facility be held personally liable
for all these potential costs. Thus, you may
wish to eliminate this provision altogether from
the agreement in light of the fact that both
parties have agreed to purchase insurance for
such contingencies. However, if the managed care
organization insists on the provision, then you
may wish to first verify with your insurance
company that the clause as drafted would be
covered by the company. If your insurer states
that it will not cover the liabilities arising
from such an agreement, then that gives your
facility further ammunition for negotiating the
provision out of the agreement.
- Medical records
MCOs may need to review a residents
medical record as part of its UR procedures in
order to verify medical necessity, or for other
purposes. Generally, managed care form
agreements state that the MCO shall be provided
access to and copies of such records upon
request. Such a provision raises a couple of
issues: Is the MCO entitled to such records? Is
confidentiality protected? and Who pays for such
copies?
You should consider having your agreements
specify that it is the MCOs responsibility
to provide you with an appropriate medical
records release whenever it requests resident
records. This should be fairly easy for the MCO
to obtain when it executes its member agreement
with the resident. Also, the MCO should certify
that it will protect the confidentiality of any
medical records, and only release those records
in accordance with state and federal
laws.
With regard to access to medical records, if
the MCO wishes to view the records in your
facility, then it should be required to give you
appropriate advance notice, and not just show up
to your facility. Also, if the MCO would like
copies of any records then it should pay for
those copies, the labor it took to make the
copies and any delivery charges for sending the
copies to the MCO.
- Governing law
You may be contracting with an MCO that is
based out of another state, and if so, it may
have a provision which states that the managed
care agreement is subject to the laws of that
other state. You want to make sure that if there
is any dispute which arises under the contract
that requires litigation that the litigation
takes place in your state and subject to the
laws of your state. The services will be
rendered in your state and so such a provision
makes sense. Plus, you do not want to have to
travel to another state in order to enforce your
rights.
Incorporation of policies and procedures
We discussed this concept above, and it is
worth repeating. Your organization should avoid
signing contracts where it does not know all of
the terms of the agreement. Many MCOs ask you to
do just that by adding a provision which states
that the agreement incorporates by reference all
of the MCOs policies and procedures. In order to
protect yourself, you should (a) review all of
these policies and procedures prior to executing
the contract, (b) attach those policies and
procedures as exhibits to the contract, and (c)
take the precautions described above with regard
to amendments and utilization review.
IV.
Conclusion
This section of the Manual has not sought to be
comprehensive an entire industry has
developed in order to advise providers on how to
negotiate particular sections of a managed care
contract. There are many more potential pitfalls
and nuances to managed care contracting than the
scope of this article could address. The goal of
this section was, as we stated at the beginning,
threefold: (1) to provide you with a framework
through which to approach managed care contracting;
(2) to provide you with a basic understanding of
some basic negotiating and managed care principles;
and (3) to review some key provisions which
generally appear in managed care contracts with
nursing facilities.
We also chose not to provide you with any
"standard" contract language. We believe that there
is a danger in cutting and pasting provisions into
a managed care agreement without a certain depth of
understanding as to what those provisions really
mean, and what the implications of those terms are
on other terms in the agreement. Often times,
nursing facilities that attempt to use a bit of
language from this source and another piece from
that source end up with a Frankensteins
monster for a contract all the pieces may
have independently appeared appropriate, but they
did not fit together very well. Therefore, while
the purpose of this article was designed to enhance
the readers understanding of the managed care
contracting process, and his or her ability to
"issue spot," it should not serve as a substitute
for advice from competent legal counsel in the
negotiating and contracting process.
Roth, Rolf & Goffman Co., L.P.A.
July, 1998.
This article is presented as general
information only and is not a substitute for legal
advice. If you have any questions concerning
application of the law to particular facts, you
should consult with legal counsel.
| Practice Areas
| Attorney
Profiles | Publications
|
| Seminars | Screen
for Exclusion | Contact
Info |
| Directions |
Home |
Rolf & Goffman Co., L.P.A.
Phone 216-514-1100
E-mail info@rolfgoffman.com
|