Rolf & Goffman Co., L.P.A.Publications

Practice Areas

Attorney Profiles

Publications

Seminars

OIG Sanction Database

Contact Info

Directions

Home

LONG-TERM CARE MANAGED CARE CONTRACTING SKILLS

By
Aric D. Martin, Esq.

I. Getting Ready for Managed Care
II. Choosing the Right Managed Care Organization
III. Negotiating the Contract
A. Important Provisions - General
1. Coverage issues
2. Utilization review
3. Payment
4. Termination
B. Important Provisions for Nursing Facilities
1. Admission, transfer & discharge
2. Notifications
3. Requirements for participation
C. Important "Miscellaneous" Provisions
IV. Conclusion

There is a drive in the long-term care industry for facilities to execute managed care contracts, and a feeling by many facilities that they are "behind the times" in entering into such agreements. Often those sentiments lead facilities to feel rushed to enter into agreements, and to perhaps take the leap before they are ready. A basic managed care contracting skill that all nursing facilities should develop is to know when to contract in the first place. Other parts of this Manual have discussed preparing your facility for managed care, and how to choose a managed care provider. Because of the importance those two concepts have in relation to managed care contracting, we will briefly discuss them here as well. We will then discuss specific provisions in managed care contracts that have caused problems for long-term care providers.

This section of the Manual seeks to accomplish three things: (1) to provide you with a framework through which to approach managed care contracting; (2) to provide you with a basic understanding of some basic negotiating and managed care principles; and (3) to review some key provisions which generally appear in managed care contracts with nursing facilities.

I. Getting Ready for Managed Care 

The first step in managed care contracting is to determine whether your organization really wishes to enter into managed care contracts, and if so, whether it is ready to do so. In order to enter into managed care contracts that will benefit your organization, you should first know what sort of services it is equipped to provide, how quickly it can provide those services, and how much it costs to provide those services. 

Facilities should conduct an inventory and self-audit in which you examine your direct care staff and personnel, your physical facilities and structure, and your indirect and overhead staff and ask the following questions:

  • Do you have sufficient resources to handle admission determinations and documentation, e.g., verification of eligibility, and an evaluation of whether your facility can provide the level of care needed?
  • Can your facility provide the services requested at the time that such services are requested, i.e., are you equipped to admit patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, or is your staffing such that nighttime and weekend admits are not possible?
  • Do you have sufficient resources to maintain the necessary records during the managed care patient’s stay, and to bill for those services? Remember that each contract you enter into may have completely different billing and record-keeping requirements that your staff will need to understand and implement correctly in order to be paid for services rendered.
  • Do you have sufficient resources to ensure that the bill which your facility submits for services rendered will be able to withstand the scrutiny of the managed care organization’s utilization review process – both at the time of submission and during any retrospective review periods.
  • What services are you equipped to provide – both from a structural and staffing standpoint, e.g., do you have the capability to provide vents and respiratory therapy, dialysis, care for persons with HIV, care for persons with diabetes, cardiac rehabilitation, etc.?
  • What population are you equipped to serve, and what population will you be asked to serve? For example, is your facility equipped to care not only for an elderly population, but also for a younger population that may need short-term rehabilitative care, i.e., not just in terms of traditional medical care, but also from a psychological and activities standpoint?
  • Does your facility have any particular expertise in treating a particular diagnosis?
  • What are the diagnoses of the discharges that you will be admitting? 

After conducting an inventory of your current capabilities, and the needs of the potential managed care population, you will need to determine whether your facility is in a position to effectively care for that population. If it is not, then you will need to find out how much it will cost you in order to get into such a position.

II. Choosing the Right Managed Care Organization 

After you have conducted an inquiry into your organization’s readiness to provide care to managed care patients, and you have decided to enter into such agreements, you will need to decide which managed care organizations ("MCOs") would be a good match for your facility. As you are aware, there are a proliferation of managed care products being developed in the market today. It is thus important that your facility is diligent in determining which of the products offered will best serve its needs and unique structure.

The primary reason for entering into a managed care contract is (1) to obtain access to previously untapped patient streams, and (2) to ensure predictability of patients and revenue. Thus, some analysis of the proposed managed care product may be appropriate prior to entering into active negotiation. Consider the following:

  • Evaluate the proposed arrangement in light of the long-term goals and strategic plans of your organization.
  • What is the managed care product’s volume of enrollees?
  • What other providers are under contract with the network or plan?
  • Will your facility be the exclusive provider of services in the area?
  • Who owns the plan or network, and what kind of management/administration does it have?
  • Determine the actual cost of providing the care required by the proposed arrangement.
    • In making this determination, you will need to define the covered services.
    • You will also need to predict the expected utilization of each of the covered services, e.g., the number of visits, patient days, or prescriptions during one year per a certain number of people.
    • You then must determine what the desired reimbursement rate should be for each of the covered services (per day, per procedure, per month, per visit).
    • Take into consideration the effect of copayments on the expected cost of health care services.
    • Predict the effect of age and sex on expected utilization.
  • Conduct a due diligence investigation and review the following:
    • Copies of any rules or regulations and utilization review procedures that your facility will be required to abide by.
    • Financial statements or audits of the plan or network.
    • State and federal filings with applicable agencies.
    • Newspaper and other media sources. 

The purpose of the above steps is for your organization to have a clear picture of what services it can offer, and what reimbursement it must receive for those services in order to make an acceptable profit. It is also to discover whether the managed care provider or network has a sufficient number of enrollees to give your facility a predictable patient flow, and also whether the product has adequate capitalization to protect against insolvency. If, after this background analysis of both your organization and the managed care product, you decide to move forward in the negotiation of a contract with the plan or network, then it is important that you understand some basic principles of managed care contracting.

III. Negotiating the Contract

In the negotiation of any contract it is crucial that before you actively begin negotiations that you fully understand what you want to achieve at the end of the negotiation. That is, you must establish in advance a hierarchy of your goals, and to know what you are willing to give up. In order to accomplish this feat in the managed care context, armed with the knowledge you gained through your self-audits, you will need to be familiar with the following concepts.

  • The contract drives the relationship.

    The contract that you execute with a managed care organization will define your business relationship. Unlike with traditional governmental reimbursement systems, such as Medicare, external rules and regulations which define elements of the relationship between the provider and payor are scarce. There are laws in place to protect the beneficiary of managed care services, but not many laws to protect the provider of services.

    As in all business contracts, you are assumed to have a level of sophistication sufficient to protect your interests in a contract negotiation. If you negotiate a bad deal, then you have only yourself to blame. Thus, it is vital for nursing facility operators to understand that their future relationship with the managed care organization will be driven by the contract, and that they cannot rely on outside rules to protect them.

  • You do not have to accept the form contract.

    Given the fact that the managed care contract will define almost all of your rights and responsibilities in your relationship with the managed care organization, the dangers of signing an MCO’s "form contract" should be apparent.

    Understandably, a managed care organization will draft its form contract in a very one-sided manner with some terms that may be very unreasonable from the nursing facility provider’s standpoint. Such an approach makes sense in light of the fact that often - too often - nursing facilities, in a rush to "get into managed care", simply sign the agreement they are given. Long-term care providers, however, should view the MCO’s form contract as its first proposal - a starting point to begin negotiations. Managed care organizations expect providers to object to certain terms, and to attempt to negotiate a better agreement.

  • Bargaining power.

    How successful you will be in changing the MCO’s form contract will be dependent in large measure on the importance that you each place on the other’s business. If a managed care organization does not have a presence in your county, if your facility provides a specialized service that most facilities do not provide or provide as efficiently as you do, if you are part of a chain or an alliance of facilities that can provide numerous sites of service for the MCO, then your chances of negotiating changes to the form contract are greatly increased. If, however, your nursing facility is a single facility that is not aligned with any other area facilities, or if the MCO can easily turn to another similarly situated facility to provide services to its members, then your odds of negotiating favorable terms in your agreements will be significantly reduced.

  • Before beginning negotiations, long-term care facilities should use the self-audit mechanism discussed above to think about how to market themselves to managed care organizations. That is, how to differentiate their services from the other nursing facilities in the area.
    • Know your costs.

      One element that will differentiate your facility from others will be how efficiently you can provide the services needed by the managed care organization’s members. If you have the ability to market that you can provide quality care at a cheaper price than your competitor, then obviously the incentive to contract with you increases.

  • An understanding of what it costs for you to provide care to your patients is essential to providing care to managed care patients. You should know how much it costs you to provide care to the different diagnoses that the MCO will be referring to you. For example, what is the cost and turn around time from admission to discharge for an elderly woman with a hip fracture? Your facility may wish to implement "care pathways" to assist you in the efficient care of patients with the diagnoses that you will be receiving from the MCO.
    • Terms are as important as price.

      Many providers believe that they do not need to have a tight handle on their costs because they examine the price term in the proposed managed care contract and determine that at that price they will make a profit, based on a comparison to past price terms with the government for the same care. Such an attitude, however, is misplaced in the managed care context. As we stated above, the contract drives the relationship. Providers need to be keenly aware of the fact that simply because they provided services to a managed care patient does not mean that they will be paid for those services.

      A hard lesson for people who are not familiar with negotiating contracts is the fact that the terms of a contract are just as important, if not more important, than the price being offered. This fact is highlighted in the managed care context. For example, a nursing facility may willingly sign a contract whereby it will receive $350 per patient per day for providing skilled care services to managed care beneficiaries because it feels confident that it can make an acceptable profit at that rate. However, if the contract has rigid terms, then it may not be a beneficial contract for the provider. For example, if the contract has such terms as (i) an aggressive retrospective review program, (ii) no provision to pay your facility in a set period of time, (iii) the ability to deny claims based on simple technical billing errors, (iv) a provision that the rate includes many services that the facility does not normally provide and for which it must subcontract, etc., then the nursing facility (i) may not receive payment for all of the services that it provides, (ii) have that payment taken away at a later date, or (iii) the rate may prove insufficient to cover the level and nature of services that it is expected to provide.

  • Managed care contracts are notorious for having "hidden terms" which have the potential to nullify apparently favorable conditions for the provider of services. It is essential that nursing facilities not simply rely on the price that they have been quoted in determining whether to enter into a managed care agreement.
    • Risk.

      When your organization does look at the prices proposed to you, keep in mind that you will be expected to assume some risk in the relationship. Many nursing facilities become very anxious about the concept of "taking on risk", and that anxiety effects the manner in which they negotiate their managed care agreements. Remember that the reason to enter into managed care relationships is to obtain a stream of patients and to achieve some predictability in patient referrals. Understand that you will not make a profit on every patient that is referred to you, but that is not necessarily a negative. Your facility will lose money on many patients, but it will also make money on many patients. The fact that it is costing you more to provide for a particular patient does not mean that you are losing money, or that you have entered into an unfavorable managed care contract. The hope is that overall you make a profit.

  • Thus, the fact that you may not be able to provide a certain service, e.g., respiratory therapy, to a patient for the price quoted to you is not necessarily a deal breaker. If you will receive only a minimal amount of vent patient referrals (and you have provisions in your agreement to protect against having to accept all referrals made), then it may make sound business sense to accept a rate with the knowledge that you will "lose money" on each vent patient.
    • Address "deal breakers" first.

      As we stated above, it is necessary that you begin your managed care contract negotiations with the knowledge of what you wish to achieve, and with what end result you can live. Thus, it is important to identify those terms that are "deal breakers", that is, terms that you must receive in order to execute the contract, and address those terms first. If you can not reach agreement with the MCO with regard to those terms, then there is no need to review a proposed contract. We suggest that nursing facilities address these deal breakers with the managed care organization prior to reviewing any actual proposed contract language. Reaching agreement on these terms before contract review not only saves your organization time and money, but also will make it easy to revise the form contract when you receive it later if it is not in accordance with your prior agreement.

      What terms are deal breakers will vary according to the unique structure and goals of each organization. Generally, however, there are certain terms that are of vital importance to all nursing facilities, and we discuss those first below, i.e., coverage issues, utilization review, payment and termination.

    • Time allocation.

      Finally, when entering into managed care contract negotiations, keep in mind that this process can often times be very lengthy. For various reasons, these negotiations can stretch out for months. Thus, it would be prudent for nursing facilities to establish with the MCO certain time frames for the review and negotiation of the contract at the start of the negotiations. Such an agreement is not a guarantee that the negotiation process will necessarily move along quickly, but hopefully it will provide extra incentive to keep the process moving. Also, keep in mind that the manner in which the MCO handles the negotiation process may be an insight into how it generally runs its business operations

    A. Important Provisions - General 

    As noted above, there are certain provisions in a managed care contract which may contain "hidden" pitfalls for long-term care providers. These provisions have the potential to cost a nursing facility much in terms of money and time, and should always be examined very closely.

    1. Coverage issues

    It is very important that your managed care contract explicitly states what services you must provide under the payment rate, and to whom you must provide those services. As we discussed above, you should know the member population that the MCO services, how many covered lives are in that population, and the types of plans covering those members. If you are incapable of providing care to any of the member categories under the plan, then you should make sure that your contract states that fact explicitly.

    Generally, a managed care contract will state that a provider will provide "Covered Services" to members of the MCO’s plan in exchange for a set payment rate. In order to protect your facility, review the definition section of the managed care agreement closely. Often times the definition of "Covered Services" will state something similar to the following: "‘Covered Services’ shall mean all services and supplies which are necessary to treat a Member’s medical condition." This vague definition is terrible for long-term care providers. This provision allows the MCO to refer any type of patient needing any type of care to your facility for treatment regardless of whether your facility even offers that service.

    Another common provision of which facilities should beware is one which states that "‘Covered Services’ shall mean all services and supplies to which the Member is entitled to under his or her Member’s benefit plan." This provision defines the services that you must provide by reference to a document that you have never seen.

    In both of the definitions above, your facility is being asked to sign an agreement which gives the MCO carte blanche to refer any type of patient to you for any type of service. In order to protect your facility, you should make sure that there is a definition of "Covered Services" in your contract, and that that definition states explicitly which services you will provide in return for the quoted rate, and which services are not included in the rate. The provision should make it clear that you will only accept patients for whom you are licensed, certified, equipped and/or staffed to provide care for. The definition should also make it clear that "Covered Services" include only those services which are part of the member’s benefits plan.

    When thinking about coverage issues, also determine whether the rate quoted is an "all inclusive" rate. That is, will your facility receive the same level of reimbursement regardless of the service provided? If so, consider "carving out" certain high cost services, e.g., obtaining a different payment rate for the provision of those high cost services. A popular option with nursing facilities is to design a graduated rate structure whereby as the acuity level of the referred member increases, the rate paid by the MCO increases as well.

    2. Utilization review

    The managed care organization will have a utilization review protocol established in order to ensure that its rules are being followed. For example, many MCOs will have member verification procedures that nursing facilities will be required to follow to ensure that a patient is currently enrolled as a member with the MCO. However, generally this procedure will only verify that the person is indeed a member of the plan, and that the proposed service is covered by the plan. It will not determine whether the proposed service is "medically necessary." MCOs only pay for medically necessary health care services, and thus in order to determine whether the service that it is being asked to pay for was medically necessary, it will establish a utilization review ("UR") mechanism. The nature and extent of this UR protocol and system is different for each managed care organization. Utilization review, however, can be very extensive. Nursing facilities need to make sure that this system is well-defined in their managed care contracts, and to obtain a copy of this mechanism as soon as possible in writing.

    Generally, managed care agreements do not address their UR mechanisms fully. It is not uncommon for an agreement to simply state that the long-term care provider agrees to abide by all policies and procedures in the MCO’s UR program, which is thereby incorporated into the agreement by reference (meaning that the program is not attached to the agreement, but that you are subject to its terms). It is also not uncommon for nursing facilities to sign such a provision without a thought. However, a broad provision like that may nullify every term in the agreement without your facility even being aware of that fact.

    Without exception all long-term care providers when asked if they would sign a contract under the following conditions: (1) the contract only contained a fraction of the terms to which they would be legally bound; (2) they would not be made aware of the "other" terms of the agreement before signing the agreement; and (3) all terms of the agreement may be changed at the sole discretion of the other party, would emphatically state, "NO!". However, many of those same nursing facilities sign managed care agreements that incorporate entire policies by reference, thereby making them part of the agreement - policies that the providers have never seen, and that may be changed without their consent. Facilities should never sign a contract that incorporates documents that it has never seen.

    It is important that UR provisions in your managed care contracts are not open ended. Always request to review the UR policies and procedures prior to executing the managed care contract. If the UR program is not established in writing at the time of the contract negotiations and can be amended unilaterally, then attempt to negotiate one of the following: (a) require your facility’s consent prior to any material changes; (b) require the MCO to give your facility adequate written notice of any change, and the opportunity to comment; or (c) at a minimum, your facility must be able to terminate the agreement without cause immediately if it does not accept provisions of the UR program.

    As you review the MCO’s UR program, you should make sure that it adheres to certain specifications.

    •  Review the qualifications for the UR personnel, e.g., nurse reviewers should be licensed and trained with minimum experience requirements.
    • Physician reviewers should practice in the area that they review, e.g., you should not have an obstetrician reviewing the medical necessity of a geriatric procedure for which you are requesting reimbursement.
    • Do the UR personnel, or does the UR management entity, comply with the American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review requirements, or with the requirements of some other certifying group?
    • The procedures should include a discussion with the attending health professional prior to rendering a payment denial.
    • Emergency admissions and procedures should be exempt from traditional review.
    • The basis for denials should be consistently documented.
    • Denials of payment should be consistently appealable by the patient and by the provider.
    • Medical criteria should be based on local practice standards.

    In addition to negotiating the protections noted above, i.e., seeking language which provides that no policies are applicable to your facility without your prior approval, asking for advance notice of any changes to the UR program, etc., your managed care contract should spell out certain standards with regard to the UR program. You should then negotiate a provision which provides that if there is ever any conflict between the terms of the executed contract and the policies and procedures of the MCO, then it is the intent of the parties that the terms in the agreement shall control. Some standards that you may wish to consider negotiating into your agreements are as follows:

    • No retrospective review. There should no be retrospective review of preauthorized services. To the extent that care is ordered by the patient’s participating physician, such care, when rendered by the provider should not be subject to further determinations of medical necessity. It is important that this provision is stated explicitly in writing.
    • Administrative errors. There should not be forfeitures for administrative errors, i.e., payment should not be able to be denied if the services would have been approved prospectively on the basis of medical necessity. This applies to situations where a nursing facility failed to fill in a certain section of a billing form when it submitted its claim to the MCO, or some other minor error. An MCO’s UR protocols may state that such an error is a basis for a denial of the entire claim.
    • MCO responsibility for design and implementation of UR program. Language should be in the agreement which specifically states that the MCO is responsible for the design and implementation of the UR program, and that the MCO should indemnify the provider for any loss incurred as a result of such program. MCOs should not be allowed to shift to your facility all responsibility for medical decisions relating to termination of treatment resulting from the UR program, such as clauses which state that the provider is "solely" responsible for health care provided. For example, if an MCO determines that a certain service is not medically necessary and thus your facility does not provide that service, then the MCO should bear, or share some of, the responsibility if you are held accountable for that decision, e.g., in a lawsuit or a certification citation.
    • Appeal procedures. There must be a meaningful mechanism for your facility to appeal UR decisions, and this mechanism must include the ability to appeal to an independent third party. For example, many MCOs have appeal mechanisms whereby the "final determination" is made by the medical director of the MCO.
    • Medical necessity. Because only medically necessary services are covered services, then the term should be clearly defined.
    • Denials. The agreement must specify who is responsible for notifying patients of denials under the UR program. Also, it should address who pays if the patient elects to appeal, and at what rate. That is, who keeps the money pending an appeal of a UR decision, and is that money paid in cash or deducted from an amount otherwise owed?
    • Concurrent review. Your agreement should require the MCO to continue payment during a period in which state and federal laws prohibit transfer or discharge of a patient - even though the MCO’s concurrent review concludes that transfer or discharge is appropriate. This situation is one of unique vulnerability for long-term care providers, and is discussed more fully below.

    3. Payment

    As alluded to above, an MCO’s UR procedures may require your organization to follow detailed steps in the submission of a claim for payment in order to be reimbursed for the services that you provided. Often times, however, these steps are absent from the agreement, and may be made part of the agreement only by incorporating the UR policies by reference. Your organization must remember that every delay in or denial of payment to your facility is a reduction in your profit. A late payment to your facility is the equivalent of an interest free loan to the MCO. Thus, it is very important that your agreement contains specific language which spells out to whom, when, where, at what time, and in what manner claims are to be submitted.

    We have listed below numerous elements that you should consider making a part of the payment section of any managed care contracts which you execute.

    • Specify the billing form that your organization is to use to submit its claims, e.g., a UB-92 form. If the form that the MCO wishes you to use is not a standard form in the industry, but rather an internally generated one, then attach a sample form to the agreement as an exhibit.
    • Designate the address to which claims should be sent. Note that the MCO may allow or require electronic submission.
    • Define the receipt of a claim. For example, if claims are submitted via regular U.S. mail, then specify that claims are deemed received within five days of mailing, or if via facsimile upon receipt of a confirmation.
    • Define a "clean claim." A clean claim is a term of art in the managed care industry that refers to a claim which will be accepted by a payor as valid, and upon which the payor will make payment. In essence, you want to ask the MCO what information is absolutely necessary in order for it to make payment on a claim, and then to agree that if you supply that information it will pay the claim - regardless of any other technical defects in your claim submission.
    • Define the time frame in which the MCO must respond to your submitted claim, e.g., that the MCO will within thirty days of receipt of a claim issue payment, a denial with explanation, or a request for more information.
    • Specify that the MCO must pay interest for any late payments that it sends to your facility.
    • If your agreement states that our facility is not to bill the MCO until the end of a length-of-stay, then add language which would allow for interim billing when the length-of-stay is longer than expected.
    • Make sure that the protections which you have negotiated into the agreement apply to any third-party administrators to whom the MCO has subcontracted the claims-paying function.
    • Do not allow any billing amendments without the express written consent of a specified person in your organization.
    • Do not allow the MCO to withhold payments to you for current services rendered based upon its unilateral determination that prior submissions were incorrectly paid.

    4. Termination

    Although it is a standard provision, and one that is generally not given much thought, the termination clause in your managed care agreement may be your ultimate protection. Being able to terminate the contract without cause may be your only real remedy if you are unable to negotiate out onerous provisions from the MCO’s form contract, such as the right to amend the contract unilaterally, and the right to change UR plans from time to time. Thus, your facility should make sure to avoid provisions which only allow termination for cause, or within a certain time frame.

    Do not be fooled by what appears to be a clause which allows you to terminate for cause, but in reality locks your facility into the agreement for a set period of time. For example, an agreement may specify that either party may terminate the agreement with or without cause by providing written notice to the other party within ninety days prior to the end of the existing term, and that if such notice is not given then the contract will renew for another year period. In this scenario, if your organization executed a one year agreement, and then realized after the third month that it was losing its shirt under the arrangement, you would have to provide services under the agreement for another nine months. Also, if you provided any amount of notice less than ninety days, then you would be obligated to provide services for another whole year. This sort of provision is fairly common, and commonly overlooked by providers who focus on the words "terminated with or without cause," and believe that because they can terminate without cause they are protected.

    When reviewing the termination clause of a proposed agreement, your facility should make sure that the effective date and the initial term and renewal terms are addressed. The terms should not be greater than one year, unless exceptional incentives are offered to your organization. You should also retain the right to terminate the agreement immediately, or on an expedited basis, if the MCO materially breaches the agreement or it makes unilateral changes to its policies and procedures that your facility finds unacceptable. Be prepared for the MCO to resist allowing termination prior to the end of the term because it may have marketed its plan to members, and qualified it for regulatory purposes based in part on your participation. Also, keep in mind that your facility may not want the MCO to be able to terminate early if it has many members that it will be able to refer to you.

    Many termination clauses in managed care agreements provide that the nursing facility must continue to provide care to patients who are receiving services as of the date of the termination until such patients are transferred or discharged. You should make sure that your agreement specifies that the MCO will remain liable for payment in such a situation. This concept is discussed more fully below.

    B. Important Provisions for Nursing Facilities

    It is important for nursing facilities to remember that signing an agreement with a managed care organization does not exempt them from the myriad laws and regulations to which they are subject under the Nursing Home Reform Act ("OBRA"). Although some managed care organizations are improving, many do not have familiarity with nursing facilities. It is common for a nursing facility to receive a standard contract which was designed for a hospital or a physician group practice. Thus, a significant part of your managed care contract negotiations may consist of educating the MCO with regard to the laws and regulations to which your organization is subject. Often times, the MCO is not aware of the extent to which nursing facilities are regulated. However, if you present the MCO with evidence, i.e., a copy of the relevant law, then you should be successful in having the MCO revise the proposed agreement to comport with that law.

    We have provided below a sample of some of the provisions that a nursing facility should pay close attention to when negotiating managed care contracts.

    1. Admission, transfer & discharge

    Nursing facilities have specific laws governing the admission, transfer and discharge of a resident, which your managed care agreements will need to respect. Federal law states that a nursing facility is required to give notice to a resident and a family member or legal representative thirty days prior to a transfer or discharge. Managed care contracts, however, generally provide that the MCO will continue to pay for the care of its members until the agreement with your facility is terminated, or perhaps until the end of a specified period. This situation can cause significant financial problems for a nursing facility if it does not reconcile the two differing constructions.

    If your facility has such a contract, and your managed care contract is terminated while the MCO still has several residents in your facility, then how will you be paid for the care that you provide to those residents post-termination? You have signed an agreement whereby you have agreed that the MCO will not pay you after termination of the agreement, and you must give the residents at least thirty days’ notice before you can discharge them. Remember also that in order to discharge for nonpayment, your facility must have given the resident "reasonable and appropriate notice" of their obligation to pay, so even in the absence of state laws that protect residents in such a situation, you will be potentially liable for over thirty days of nonpayment.

    In order to avoid such a situation, negotiate into your agreements a provision which states that the MCO will continue to provide payment for any residents in your facility at the time of termination until the MCO finds alternative placement or the person is discharged from the facility. This will obligate the MCO to make payment during any notice periods that are required by law. The rates that the MCO should pay during this post-termination period will depend upon your bargaining power. Generally, it will be a victory if you establish that the MCO will pay you at the rates in, and according to the terms and conditions of, the contract. However, because there is no longer a contract between your organization and the MCO, you may attempt to establish that payment will be made at your usual and customary private pay rate. If you are successful in establishing such a rate, then this will give the MCO incentive to find alternative placement for its member after termination.

    Some other considerations that your organization should keep in mind while it is negotiating managed care agreements are as follows:  

    • Address issues of eligibility verification, and how your facility will be able to conclusively rely on the verification of eligibility and coverage. For example, if you are given a valid member identification card, and call the MCO to verify that the person is still a member and entitled to nursing facility coverage, then you should be paid for the provision of care to that person (assuming the services were medically necessary). Some MCOs, however, will retroactively deny reimbursement based on the fact that the person was subsequently discovered to have exhausted his or her benefits; or his or her plan was retroactively discontinued due to nonpayment by the sponsor (employer). You should not bear the risk of the MCO’s records not being updated.
    • Often times, a managed care agreement will simply state that a facility will provide covered services to members of the MCO, and does not address the admission of these members. Under such a provision, a nursing facility has obligated itself to accept all members regardless of diagnosis. Your agreement should specify what types of patients you are not required to accept, and who makes the determination regarding acceptance of a patient, e.g., is the final determination made by the facility’s medical director or the MCO?
    • An efficient way to handle the admissions process in your managed care agreement is to simply state that your facility will admit patients in accordance with its normal and customary admissions policy. You may tell the MCO that this is necessary because your admissions policy has been designed to comply with specific requirements of state and federal law. Such a provision will allow you to continue to satisfy any waiting list laws to which you are subject, and give you the ability to deny admissions to patients for whom you are not equipped to provide appropriate care.
    • Remember that although you have a contract with the MCO, federal and state law will require that your facility have a separate admission agreement with the resident. Some modification of your standard admission agreement will most likely be needed.
    • Make sure to delineate the bed hold policy of your facility, and to specify the payment structure during any such bed holds. If you are required to hold a bed for a resident while he or she is at the hospital, then you should be paid during that time.
    • Your facility may wish to add a provision to its managed care agreements which makes it clear that it may move a resident within the various units of the facility as needed without prior approval from the MCO.
    • Generally, a managed care contract will state that it will have the final word with regard to any decision to discharge the resident from the facility. You should consider having your agreements qualify such a provision with language that allows your facility to discharge a resident to the extent that it may in accordance with state and federal law. For example, to protect the health and safety of other residents in the facility.

    2. Notifications

    Some plans require facilities to notify them of any adverse action that is alleged or taken by any entity charged with regulating the facility, and of any lawsuits. Such language is too broad in light of the federal regulatory enforcement system. This language would require a nursing facility to formally notify the MCO after every survey in which it received a citation, regardless of the fact that the facility corrected the deficiency and no penalty was every imposed. Such a requirement is burdensome both for the nursing facility and for the MCO. Rather, your agreement should specify that your facility will notify the MCO of any final adverse actions taken. This will absolve your facility from reporting until it has exhausted all of its appeal rights, and a determination has been made to impose a penalty.

    3. Requirements for participation

    In general, the principles behind managed care and the certification and enforcement process for nursing facilities under OBRA are in conflict. Managed care is based on the concept of reducing costs and providing adequate, but cost-effective care. OBRA, however, is not concerned with costs, it mandates that nursing facilities must provide care which results in the highest practicable mental, physical and psychosocial well-being for all of their residents. Such a standard has been interpreted by many enforcement agencies to mean that a facility must provide extraordinary measures, and to exhaust all alternatives – even when professional medical opinion believes that an alternative is not viable.

    In light of these conflicting motivations, there is the potential for nursing facilities to receive certification deficiencies based upon the care that they provide to their managed care patients. Broadly, this means that a surveyor may determine that a facility that provided cost-efficient care to a resident based upon determinations about the medical necessity of certain interventions by the MCO was not sufficient to help the resident reach his or her highest practicable state of well-being. For example, an MCO may only authorize fifteen units of physical therapy, but the resident is not yet at his or her highest level of functioning. If the nursing facility only provides fifteen minutes of therapy, then it risks a Quality of Care citation.

    Recognizing the fact that your organization is subject to the aforementioned standard of review, you may wish to have that fact specifically recognized in your agreements. That is, have the MCO certify that it will authorize all covered services with the intent of helping the member to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable state of well-being. You may then file a grievance with the plan or appeal if it is determined that the level authorized is not appropriate. You may also wish to establish that residents will pay for any care that is not authorized, but you will need to be wary of state and federal laws protecting managed care patients and specific provisions of the agreement which state that you will accept the rate as payment in full.

    C. Important "Miscellaneous" Provisions

    We have included below some provisions that are generally located under the "Miscellaneous" section of a managed care agreement, and are assumed by many facilities to simply be "boilerplate" language to which they do not need to pay close attention. These seemingly simple and "standard" provisions, though, can create a large amount of liability on the part of your facility if you are not careful.

    • Amendments

      A managed care organization will often have language which states that it may modify the agreement at some future time. The provision may simply allow for unilateral amendments, or it may be a "negative acceptance" clause, e.g., "MCO may amend any provision of this Agreement upon written notice to Facility. Facility shall be deemed to have accepted MCO’s amendment, if Facility fails to object to such amendment in writing and submit it to the MCO within ten days." Such a provision allows an MCO to potentially change key terms of the agreement either without your facility’s approval, or with your facility’s tacit approval if the person who receives the notice is not quick on his or her feet.

  • You should negotiate this provision as we suggested above for the utilization review provisions. That is, either (a) require your facility’s consent prior to any material changes; (b) require the MCO to give your facility adequate written notice of any change, and the opportunity to comment; or (c) at a minimum, your facility must be able to terminate the agreement without cause immediately if it does not accept the amendment.
    • Appeal rights

      Your facility should be able to realistically appeal denials of payment and coverage immediately, and any reconsideration should be handled by a qualified physician and not a UR nurse. The appeals procedures for MCOs are often buried in the utilization review procedures, and thus may usually be modified at any time at the discretion of the MCO. You should make sure that the basic procedure for all appeals is spelled out specifically in the contract itself.

  • Insurance and indemnification

    Make sure that both parties are required to carry general and professional liability insurance, and not just your facility. This is important especially in light of emerging theories of liability that make MCOs liable in some cases for UR decisions and other actions that lead to malpractice liability. Your organization should be wary of attempts by the MCO to shift liability for its decisions to your facility.

    Also, it is a good idea to specify the amount and types of insurance in the agreement, rather than relying on general language which requires the MCO to have "adequate" insurance. The MCO should be required to provide you with evidence of coverage when requested, and to provide you with notice in the event of a material change in its coverage.

    Indemnification, like insurance, should be reciprocal if you decide to use such a clause. Review carefully the wording of such clauses. Many insurance policies do not cover contractually assumed obligations. Thus, when you sign the "boilerplate" provision which states that your facility "agrees to indemnify the MCO for all fines, claims, demand, suits or actions of any kind or nature arising by nature of your acts or omissions," you may be agreeing to have the facility be held personally liable for all these potential costs. Thus, you may wish to eliminate this provision altogether from the agreement in light of the fact that both parties have agreed to purchase insurance for such contingencies. However, if the managed care organization insists on the provision, then you may wish to first verify with your insurance company that the clause as drafted would be covered by the company. If your insurer states that it will not cover the liabilities arising from such an agreement, then that gives your facility further ammunition for negotiating the provision out of the agreement.

    • Medical records

      MCOs may need to review a resident’s medical record as part of its UR procedures in order to verify medical necessity, or for other purposes. Generally, managed care form agreements state that the MCO shall be provided access to and copies of such records upon request. Such a provision raises a couple of issues: Is the MCO entitled to such records? Is confidentiality protected? and Who pays for such copies?

      You should consider having your agreements specify that it is the MCO’s responsibility to provide you with an appropriate medical records release whenever it requests resident records. This should be fairly easy for the MCO to obtain when it executes its member agreement with the resident. Also, the MCO should certify that it will protect the confidentiality of any medical records, and only release those records in accordance with state and federal laws.

  • With regard to access to medical records, if the MCO wishes to view the records in your facility, then it should be required to give you appropriate advance notice, and not just show up to your facility. Also, if the MCO would like copies of any records then it should pay for those copies, the labor it took to make the copies and any delivery charges for sending the copies to the MCO.
    • Governing law

      You may be contracting with an MCO that is based out of another state, and if so, it may have a provision which states that the managed care agreement is subject to the laws of that other state. You want to make sure that if there is any dispute which arises under the contract that requires litigation that the litigation takes place in your state and subject to the laws of your state. The services will be rendered in your state and so such a provision makes sense. Plus, you do not want to have to travel to another state in order to enforce your rights.

  • Incorporation of policies and procedures

    We discussed this concept above, and it is worth repeating. Your organization should avoid signing contracts where it does not know all of the terms of the agreement. Many MCOs ask you to do just that by adding a provision which states that the agreement incorporates by reference all of the MCOs policies and procedures. In order to protect yourself, you should (a) review all of these policies and procedures prior to executing the contract, (b) attach those policies and procedures as exhibits to the contract, and (c) take the precautions described above with regard to amendments and utilization review.

  • IV. Conclusion

    This section of the Manual has not sought to be comprehensive – an entire industry has developed in order to advise providers on how to negotiate particular sections of a managed care contract. There are many more potential pitfalls and nuances to managed care contracting than the scope of this article could address. The goal of this section was, as we stated at the beginning, threefold: (1) to provide you with a framework through which to approach managed care contracting; (2) to provide you with a basic understanding of some basic negotiating and managed care principles; and (3) to review some key provisions which generally appear in managed care contracts with nursing facilities.

    We also chose not to provide you with any "standard" contract language. We believe that there is a danger in cutting and pasting provisions into a managed care agreement without a certain depth of understanding as to what those provisions really mean, and what the implications of those terms are on other terms in the agreement. Often times, nursing facilities that attempt to use a bit of language from this source and another piece from that source end up with a Frankenstein’s monster for a contract – all the pieces may have independently appeared appropriate, but they did not fit together very well. Therefore, while the purpose of this article was designed to enhance the reader’s understanding of the managed care contracting process, and his or her ability to "issue spot," it should not serve as a substitute for advice from competent legal counsel in the negotiating and contracting process.

    Roth, Rolf & Goffman Co., L.P.A.
    July, 1998.

    This article is presented as general information only and is not a substitute for legal advice. If you have any questions concerning application of the law to particular facts, you should consult with legal counsel.

     

    | Practice Areas | Attorney Profiles | Publications |
    | Seminars | Screen for Exclusion | Contact Info |
    | Directions | Home |

    Rolf & Goffman Co., L.P.A.
    Phone 216-514-1100
    E-mail
    info@rolfgoffman.com